Where is green river ordinance from

Public domain. Local ordinances that prohibit individuals from engaging in door-to-door sales or solicitations unless the residents have given their consent are known as Green River ordinances. They are named for Green River, Wyoming, which, in , was the first town to adopt an ordinance banning door-to-door solicitation. Many other jurisdictions subsequently adopted similar ordinances.

Although such laws may conflict with rights of free speech and the free exercise of religion, the Green River ordinance was not initially challenged on First Amendment grounds. The townspeople in Green River, many of whom worked nightshifts on the railroads, favored the act as a way to reduce the number of door-to-door solicitations they were receiving, often at times when they were trying to sleep. Fuller Brush Co.

Read More. Close Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website.

We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. In his August 13, , letter to W. When traveling in various cities and towns throughout the United States, one often sees a sign stating "Green River Ordinance enforced here.

City police often receive calls from annoyed citizens when peddlers begin knocking on their doors. Now, of course, this exception was just enough to make the Ordinance unconstitutional, under the Constitution of Wyoming, and I presume under the Constitution of Maryland. See Atlantic p. Bel Air. Taliaferro further stated, "In operation, the Ordinance does not affect the merchants of the city, because they invariably have direct invitations to go to the residences occupied by those who deal with the local merchants.

The Court held that "the Town has authority to declare and punish nuisances, that the practice of house-to-house selling is a nuisance, and that the Ordinance was a reasonable exercise of police power and not in contravention of constitutional rights, or the commerce clause of the United States Constitution.